[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Network security manager
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Network security manager |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:22:01 +0200 |
> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:58 -0500
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:19 -0500 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> SM> Indeed. I could consider including it in a 24.5 release because it's
> SM> a somewhat important issue, but it would have to be "obviously safe"
> SM> (in the sense of "won't break anything"). That sounds fairly unlikely.
>
> I don't know how complicated it will be internally, but I don't think it
> will endanger any existing functionality (except TLS connections, of
> course).
Please consider possible bugs as well, not just the effect on
workflows.
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Ted Zlatanov, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/17
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/17