Re: nextstep/INSTALL: universal binaries

[David Caldwell]

On 11/4/14 2:41 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:56:52 +0100 "Jan D." <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>> Perry E. Metzger skrev den 2014-11-03 20:00:
>>> On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:36:51 +0100 "Jan D." <address@hidden>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 3 nov 2014 kl. 18:37 skrev Glenn Morris <address@hidden>:
>>>>> nextstep/INSTALL has a section on universal binaries.
>>>>> Maybe this needs updating/removing, given that ppc is no longer
>>>>> supported?
>>>>
>>>> Make sense, section removed.
>>>
>>> Does that also imply that 32 bit OS X is not supported any longer,
>>> only 64 bit? (I hadn't been paying attention, I have only 64 bit
>>> capable hardware.)
>>
>> No.
> 
> I presume then that universal binaries aren't ever used for combo
> 32bit and 64bit executable bundles? (I honestly don't know, I've
> never paid attention.)

Yes, you can have all the different arches in a universal binary (ppc,
ppc64, i386, x86_64). As far as I can know you can't have 2 of the same
arch in there though.

I don't understand those removed nextstep/INSTALL instructions though.
How did CFLAGS+="-arch ppc -arch i386" work in terms of unexec?

-David

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature