|
From: | Nicolas Richard |
Subject: | Re: Referring to revisions in the git future |
Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 2014 21:18:34 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes: > There's no reason why the commit message would need to be considered as > being part of the "immutable history". IOW there's no technical reason > to include the commit message in the Git hash. git has a separate hash for the tree. "git cat-file commit <somecommitsha1>" will show you that. (Sorry if this is known stuff.) -- Nicolas Richard
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |