[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: History for query replace pairs
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: History for query replace pairs |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:06:16 +0100 |
>>> - You still have access to the "TO-history" in the FROM case, indirectly
>>> (by browsing the corresponding FROM/TO pair and erasing the FROM and
>>> the separator).
>> The only problematic part is that if the user will be able
>> to erase the separator, then the user rightfully might want
>> to insert it back, but it's not straightforward to type a string
>> with text properties.
>
> `undo' should do it.
>
If this line is followed, I'd recommend rebinding one of the transpose
commands (transpose-lines, perhaps) to swap the TO and FROM. Having to
manually kill and yank would be a very cumbersome way of reversing the
replacement.
- RE: History for query replace pairs, (continued)
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Alan Mackenzie, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Alan Mackenzie, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/14
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/21
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/21
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/22
- Re: History for query replace pairs,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Artur Malabarba, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/26
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/25
- Re: History for query replace pairs, Juri Linkov, 2014/10/26