[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:49:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (gnu/linux) |
I wrote:
> What you wrote above simply shows your ignorance of Guile. Yes, we use
> libunistring for some things, but we do _not_ use it for character
> encoding conversions. For that we use iconv, which gives us all the
> tools we need to provide Emacs-like behavior.
It turns out I was partially mistaken. We use iconv in some places and
libunistring in some others. Anyway, it seems that I have lost my
temper with David, which is embarrassing. I'd best drop out of this
conversation now.
Mark
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/12
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/11