[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:04:50 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Do people write spam/virus checkers using Guile?
I don't know. Why do you care?
Because hypothetical examples that I think are unlikely to really
occur carry very little weight in this argument.
If such a
user discovers that Guile emits nonconformant UTF-8, they'll surely
have to wonder what other security holes they've imported by simply
selecting Guile as an application platform.
I don't think we should make practical decisions based on such "What
would they think?" arguments. We should do what's right, and people
can think what they like.
To put it another way, Mark said that Guile is intended to be useful
writing servers as well as interactive programs.
This discussion is about Guile in the context of Emacs specifically.
"What Guile does" generally is a different, though related, topic.
Guile could follow the Unicode spec in normal operation, but offer
another mode that Emacs can use.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/10/06