[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:07:38 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:58:18 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > When one of the functions that create "scoped" Lisp objects aborts,
> > the first thing to look at is the addresses of the stack variables:
> > if they are not 8-byte aligned, that's the reason. For example:
> >
> >> #1 0x01173d6b in die (msg=0x14bb004 "XTYPE (a) == type && XUNTAG (a,
> type) == ptr", file=0x14baf34 "lisp.h", line=926) at alloc.c:7111
> >
> > See the address of 'msg'? It's clearly aligned on a 4-byte boundary.
>
> I wouldn't even have known that 0x14bb004 denotes a stack address.
You know that by looking at the source, where 'die' is called. The
variable that is passed as the 1st argument to 'die' is a local
variable in the function that calls 'die', so it is on the stack.
> And then look whether it ends with "4" or "C" ...
I didn't mean to say you should have known. I explained this so you
could do that in the future.
- Current trunk aborts with MinGW, martin rudalics, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, Andy Moreton, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, martin rudalics, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, martin rudalics, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, martin rudalics, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, Andy Moreton, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, martin rudalics, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/30
- Re: Current trunk aborts with MinGW, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/30