[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:15:39 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Óscar Fuentes <ofv <at> wanadoo.es> writes:
>
> LLVM is not a VM (Virtual Machine). I know, the name is confusing.
>
> So LLVM will not allow using multiple programming languages to configure
> Emacs.
>
I didn't talk about LLVM specifically, I used the word VM in general.
There are VMs where this is possible, the question is: is there a
sufficiently popular one (considerable developer community, supports
multiple modern languages, etc.) which is GPL compatible?
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Lally Singh, 2014/09/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), Kristian Nygaard Jensen, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, James Cloos, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2014/09/18