[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git transition workflow
From: |
Michael Mattie |
Subject: |
Re: Git transition workflow |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 03:44:05 -0700 |
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 01:09:13 +0400
Sergey Organov <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Sergey Organov writes:
> >
> > > 1. CVS in fact does the rebase
> >
> > Great! Plenty of git fans without a clue about what "workflow"
> > means, who are perfectly qualified to advocate making the same
> > mistakes I did in the CVS to Bazaar transition!
>
> I'm sorry, I probably was just lucky to switch from cvs right to git
> instead, avoiding the main mistake you made (or was forced to make)
> altogether, though I did consider bzr at some point.
>
Just a quick thought from the peanut gallery. It might really help
to create some git aliases based on the Emacs developers workflows
and some basic git usage.
a setup could create a local branch for the dev. a merge would
merge local branch to master etc...
The full git usage involves alot of options and commands and
the chatter from getting a basic workflow straightened out,
and cut & pasted into various places can be avoided largely.
Mike M
- Re: Git transition workflow, (continued)
- Re: Git transition workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, John Yates, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Achim Gratz, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow, Sergey Organov, 2014/08/13
- Re: Git transition workflow,
Michael Mattie <=
- Re: Git transition workflow, Richard Stallman, 2014/08/12