[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: newline cache
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: newline cache |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:31:25 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The function I added returns an array with 2 sub-arrays, one with
newline positions according to the cache, the other with newline
positions according to the actual buffer contents.
That may take a very long time for my RMAIL buffer, which is 4 meg. I
don't think I could tolerate having that run after each Rmail command.
To make this fast enough for me to use it to localize the bug, it
needs to operate only on a specified part of the buffer. Maybe that
will make it fast enough. If not, it needs to be optimized in other
ways too.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- newline cache, Richard Stallman, 2014/04/21
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/21
- Re: newline cache, Richard Stallman, 2014/04/22
- Re: newline cache, Stefan Monnier, 2014/04/22
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/22
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/22
- Re: newline cache, Richard Stallman, 2014/04/23
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/23
- Re: newline cache,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/23
- Re: newline cache, Richard Stallman, 2014/04/23
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/25
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/26
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/26
- Re: newline cache, Jarek Czekalski, 2014/04/29
- Re: newline cache, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/04/29