[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:15:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>:
> "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > The devil is in the details. One detail that is interesting in 2014 is
> > "Can the Ohloh crawler see your alias table?".
>
> I don't understand this question. Why would Ohloh ignore its own list
> of aliases?
Oh, I see. I thought you meant the local one implied by .mailcap.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, (continued)
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, David Kastrup, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric Hanchrow, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Andreas Schwab, 2014/03/31
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, David Kastrup, 2014/03/31
Mangled and unclear attributions in the Emacs history, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/31