[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: State of the repository conversion
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: State of the repository conversion |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:25:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> E.g., the way we merge from the release branch is due
> to the fact that bzr doesn't track cherry-picks. Git does.
No, it doesn't.
Which reminds me of a comment I made long time ago: applying fixes on
the maintenance branch and then cherry-picking them into the development
branch lowers the quality of the history of the development branch,
which is the everlasting one, while the maintenance branch will
eventually freeze and become almost irrelevant.
- Re: State of the repository conversion, (continued)
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Stefan, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Steinar Bang, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Stefan, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Steinar Bang, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Florian Weimer, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Steinar Bang, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Stefan, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, David Kastrup, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Steinar Bang, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/20
- Re: State of the repository conversion, Stefan, 2014/03/20