[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EIEIO
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: EIEIO |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:24:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) |
Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
> to use plain defstructs instead. I didn't like how EIEIO required each
> object to have a name (requiring that EIEIO allocate a new string for
> each object instance)
I can also see how something like this would scare me off, but those
would be the premature optimization voices-in-my-head speaking. Perhaps
you had case where that was indeed a problem.
Anyway, If I'm reading the docs and the code of `make-instance'
correctly, the implicit name slot is only used for printing an
object. In that case I see no reason why multiple instances of the same
class can't share the same string.
João
- Re: EIEIO, (continued)
- Re: EIEIO, Eric M. Ludlam, 2014/03/13
- Re: EIEIO, David Engster, 2014/03/14
- Re: EIEIO, Eric Abrahamsen, 2014/03/14
- Re: EIEIO, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/14
- Re: EIEIO, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/03/15
- ELPA Go integration Was: EIEIO, Eric Schulte, 2014/03/15
- Re: ELPA Go integration Was: EIEIO, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/03/16
- Re: ELPA Go integration Was: EIEIO, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/03/24
- Re: ELPA Go integration Was: EIEIO, Stefan, 2014/03/17
- Re: ELPA Go integration Was: EIEIO, Stefan, 2014/03/24
- Re: EIEIO,
João Távora <=
- Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers, Andreas Röhler, 2014/03/14
Re: About CEDET, Completion, and compilers, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/23