[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:03:39 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:34:12 -0500
> Cc: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > The point is to give people a strong motivation to implement the
> > necessary support with GCC.
>
> I don't see how avoiding clang support in Emacs provides motivation for
> GCC hackers to add this support, that's been lacking for several
> years now.
>
>
> Stefan "who'd favor a GNU clang effort, extending clang with new
> exciting features distributed under the GPL"
It is a mystery to me why you don't favor CEDET instead.
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, (continued)
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/01
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/02
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/03
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/04
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Richard Stallman, 2014/03/10