[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:03:30 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:37:51 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > On my daytime job, customers started frowning on projects implemented in
> > C++ several years ago.
>
> Reliable statistics in this area are hard to come by, but for what it's
> worth the TIOBE index for February 2014 says:
>
> 18.334% C
> 17.316% Java
> 11.341% Objective C
> 6.892% C++
> 6.450% C#
> 4.219% PHP
> 2.759% Visual Basic
> 2.157% Python
> 1.929% JavaScript
> 1.798% Visual Basic .NET
> ...
> 0.236% Emacs Lisp
> ...
>
> A decade ago, C++'s popularity was in the 15-20% range. The biggest
> up-and-comer on the above list is Objective C.
Thanks.
This basically tells the same story as what I had in my mind. Of
course, the statistics also varies according to the application's
domain and the target OS (in my case, it's either Windows or
GNU/Linux, so Objective C is never required).
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, David Kastrup, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/03/01
- Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/03/01