[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repo cpnversion progress report
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: Repo cpnversion progress report |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:26:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> To reduce the load, you can just skip the "conversion to action stamps".
I've already paid the time and complexity cost for that. There's not
really a savings there.
> For fixes it's very different. The way it works is: vc-annotate tells
> me the code was changed in commit NNNN and that commit says it's linked
> to bug#MMMM so I go check bug#MMMM to try and understand why the code is
> the way it is. This is a fairly common occurrence, and it's common to
> use the bug#NNNN reference as an "excuse" to keep the commit log
> shorter, so it's important to preserve this info.
I agree. This goes on the list of use cases that needs to be supported
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, (continued)
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Jan D., 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Eric S. Raymond, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report, Stefan Monnier, 2014/01/31
- Re: Repo cpnversion progress report,
Eric S. Raymond <=