[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move
From: |
Samuel Bronson |
Subject: |
Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jan 2014 02:14:04 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 512M RAM is not enough to achieve the tantalizingly compact footprint
> that "git gc --aggressive" purports. I'm a stubborn fool and will find
I'm given to understand that "git gc --aggressive" does not actually pack
things more efficiently in practice, and is thus a waste of time, memory,
*and* disk space.
See
http://metalinguist.wordpress.com/2007/12/06/the-woes-of-git-gc-aggressive-and-how-git-deltas-work/
Also note Linus' suggestion to use "git repack" instead, perhaps with more
aggressive options than the defaults.
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, (continued)
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, James Cloos, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, James Cloos, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, James Cloos, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Andreas Schwab, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, joakim, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Rüdiger Sonderfeld, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, joakim, 2014/01/03
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move,
Samuel Bronson <=
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/05
- "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history" (was: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move), Joshua Judson Rosen, 2014/01/05
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", Glenn Morris, 2014/01/05
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", Wolfgang Jenkner, 2014/01/05
- Re: "No safeguard against rewriting upstream bzr history", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2014/01/06
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Bozhidar Batsov, 2014/01/02
- Re: bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move, Richard Stallman, 2014/01/02