[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function.
From: |
Jarek Czekalski |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function. |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:06:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 |
W dniu 2013-11-22 08:06, Bozhidar Batsov pisze:
No comments == no objections? :-)
+1 for your idea of adding several string functions.
I see the following benefits:
1. Improvement of code readability, when using these functions.
2. Easier learning of Elisp, by making string manipulations easier to find.
What stands on the other side? What are the disadvantages of introducing
Bozhidar's functions as built-ins? I see some opinions that are to
discourage Bozhidar without giving explicit reasons.
Using "helpers.el" seems to preserve the first advantage, while losing
the second.
Jarek
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/22
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Josh, 2013/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function., Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/11/23
Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function.,
Jarek Czekalski <=