[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org merge
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: Org merge |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:35:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> The NEWS file should explain how the options have been changed, but the
> ChangeLog is only concerned about the actual code. From what you say,
> it seems to actual code shares no history with the previous code (a bit
> like a "clean room" reimplementation), so the ChangeLog doesn't need to
> explain the changes.
Okay, thanks.
>> What is difficult is to document new fonctions:
>
> The usual course of action for new functions is to describe them in
> ChangeLog as:
>
> (foo, bar, baz): New function.
>
> so other than enumerating them, there's nothing to do.
Yes -- my point was that some functions that are currently listed as
"new functions" in the Changelog I posted are part of the clean room
implementation, others are new functions corresponding to new
features. I will clean up the Changelog to only document the latter.
Then I'll repost the patch just to make sure applying it is fine.
Best,
--
Bastien
- Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/09
- Re: Org merge, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge,
Bastien <=
- Re: Org merge, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/10
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/11
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/12
- Re: Org merge, Michael Albinus, 2013/11/12
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/12
- Re: Org merge, Michael Albinus, 2013/11/12
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/12
- Re: Org merge, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/12
- Re: Org merge, Bastien, 2013/11/13