[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs
From: |
Barry OReilly |
Subject: |
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:49:42 -0500 |
> Nice, but it's a pity it's written as git-specific. Git should only
> be one of the backends and the frontend should call the appropriate
> backend after checking what VC the file is under.
It should operate on unified diffs and provide the customization for
how to obtain the unified diffs, eg 'git diff'.
Dmitry, can diff-hl be used to review patch files distributed as diff
files without relying on a VCS?
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, (continued)
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/10
- Re: Git conflict VC state detection, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/11
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/07
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/07
Re: Two feature ideas for diffs,
Barry OReilly <=