[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:02:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> Is it at all possible to change the grammar this way?
>> You'd probably have to use a trick similar to the " @ " used on the
>> space between the method name and the multiple-args.
> Ah, okay. Sounds not very efficient, performance-wise.
Could be. Every trick we add to the tokenizer is a potential
performance problem, indeed. On the contrary, code in the
rules-function is generally not performance sensitive.
Stefan
- ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/06
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/06
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/07
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/11
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/11
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Bozhidar Batsov, 2013/11/11
- Re: ruby-mide, SMIE and token priority, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/11/11