[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Nov 2013 06:48:02 +0900 |
Nathan Trapuzzano writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > "It's pretty, so it must be right" is a fallacy.
>
> I haven't argued in these terms at all.
That is true, and it doesn't matter. It's an easy trap for others to
fall into, and it's a particularly dangerous one for Emacs, which is
intentionally permissive toward irregular hacks.
> I think the only claim that can be legitimately said to be
> "tenuous" is (3), given its subjective nature. It seems to me that
> the other points are simply true.
You've already admitted that they're not. The best you can say is
that in your opinion the probability of doing any harm is negligible.
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, (continued)
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2013/11/04
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2013/11/04
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/04
- RE: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Drew Adams, 2013/11/04
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2013/11/04
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/04
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2013/11/05
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/05
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/04
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing, Nathan Trapuzzano, 2013/11/05
- Re: Double unquote/unquote-splicing,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=