[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)) |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jul 2013 08:10:17 -0400 |
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
Is this meant to be buffer-local/file-local somehow?
Yes, of course. That is the point of this:
A file could load read aliases by calling `load-read-aliases'.
If the aliases were global, no such thing would be needed;
you could use `load' to read a file of alias definitions.
I'm sorry I did not say this explicitly.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, (continued)
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/07/29
- RE: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Drew Adams, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Bastien, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), David Engster, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/27
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Jambunathan K, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/28
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/29
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/29
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Richard Stallman, 2013/07/29
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system, Lars Brinkhoff, 2013/07/27
- RE: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Drew Adams, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Juanma Barranquero, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/07/26
- Re: CommonLisp namespace system (was Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?)), Nic Ferrier, 2013/07/26
- Re: adding namespaces to emacs-lisp (better elisp?), Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/07/26