[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas
From: |
Aurélien Aptel |
Subject: |
Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:51:55 +0200 |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> I say possibly because the more I look into into the more I realize
>> it's not really helpful for complex stuff and simple stuff are easy to
>> do with a module.
>
> Things like libxml2 and libgnutls should use such a mechanism instead of
> the one they use currently.
I agree.
> Adding support for other libraries is problematic currently, so I'd
> rather try and avoid it until we have something like an FFI, so that we
> can add libraries without having to recompile Emacs.
I understand. My project could then be:
- add support for compiled modules
- rewrite libxml2 and libgnutls as modules
- complete GIR implementation
It looks like a lot of work so I can't guarantee I'll be done by the
end of the summer but I'll surely be closer to the end than the start
:)
- Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Aurélien Aptel, 2013/04/21
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, joakim, 2013/04/21
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas,
Aurélien Aptel <=
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Jérémie Courrèges-Ang las, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Jérémie Courrèges-Ang las, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/22
- Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/23
Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas, Lennart Borgman, 2013/04/22