[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:44:18 +0300 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:15:14 -0400
>
> So probably we should just go back to using "ln", and forget about
> AC_PROG_LN_S, sigh. (Or write our own test for the features of ln -s
> that we want to use). In any case, it's not something you should have
> had to worry about as part of your changes, sorry.
OK, thanks.
So I will see what happens on the mainline, and take it from there.
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, (continued)
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/16
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/17
- Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Glenn Morris, 2013/04/16
Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury, Paul Eggert, 2013/04/16