[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: please review bug #13141
From: |
Harald Hanche-Olsen |
Subject: |
Re: please review bug #13141 |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:26:53 +0100 (CET) |
[Drew Adams <address@hidden> (2013-01-21 15:05:12 UTC)]
> That doesn't mean that the emacs session where you submit the report
> must be an emacs -Q session. And some bug reports do not require a
> recipe from emacs -Q, though that's always a good idea.
I don't know about others, but I can't possibly send email from an
emacs -Q session without going through a lot of trouble. Which means
recent input and messages are almost always irrelevant. It might make
sense to only include this data provided
(y-or-n-p "Did you encounter the bug just now in this emacs session?")
- Harald
- Re: bug#13141: please review bug #13141, (continued)
- Re: bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/20
- Re: please review bug #13141, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/20
- Re: please review bug #13141, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/01/20
- Re: please review bug #13141, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/01/20
- Re: please review bug #13141, Glenn Morris, 2013/01/20
- Re: please review bug #13141, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/20
- RE: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/20
- RE: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/20
RE: please review bug #13141, Andrey Paramonov, 2013/01/21
- RE: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/21
- Re: please review bug #13141,
Harald Hanche-Olsen <=
- Re: please review bug #13141, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/01/21
- RE: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/21
- Re: please review bug #13141, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/01/21
- RE: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/22
- Re: please review bug #13141, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/01/22
- RE: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/22