[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:41:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> The problem then is how to verify GPG signatures,
SM> Easy: pass them to GPG.
>>> especially if GnuPG is not installed.
SM> Then don't check.
SM> If the user wants to check his packages, she'll have to install GPG,
SM> which AFAIK is not harder than installing Emacs.
> GPG is not always available
The important thing is that GPG can always be installed, so if the user
cares about checking integrity, she can install GPG.
> and I'd rather not call an external tool in the long term. But it's
> an acceptable compromise for now, yes.
When we get a proper FFI, we'll probably get other options. But rewriting
the code in Elisp doesn't sound like a an attractive option to me.
Stefan
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/04
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Stefan Monnier, 2013/01/04
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/04
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/04
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/06
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/06
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/07
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/07
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Ted Zlatanov, 2013/01/08
- Re: package.el + DVCS for security and convenience, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/08