[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:08:04 +0900 |
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> You could use 'finally?
In Python, "finally" has a different meaning, basically the same as
`unwind-protect' in Emacs. Python usage is merely suggestive, but I
think that's more intuitive for "finally".
"break" seems to be the obvious choice of inline syntactic keyword.
Since this is Lisp, I guess its semantics would need to be extended to
"break and return value".
Alternatively, Emacs could adopt the Scheme call/cc convention and
have an "exit function", which if called would exit the
with-timeout-forms form and return the argument of the exit function.
- Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/12/25
- Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff, Xue Fuqiao, 2012/12/25
- Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff, Karl Fogel, 2012/12/25
- Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/12/26
- Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff, Vitalie Spinu, 2012/12/27
- Re: Proposal for a new mechanism for delayed stuff, Stefan Monnier, 2012/12/29