[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:43:16 -0500 |
The dual license is required so that the MH-E Manual can be distributed
with Debian.
That is not a "need" as far as we are concerned. I don't recall what
happened in the case of MH-E, but we should not make any license
changes for this reason.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, (continued)
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/15
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/16
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/19
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Bastien, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/20
- Re: Dual licensing of Org manual?, Richard Stallman, 2012/12/14