[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Elisp native profiler
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Elisp native profiler |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:28:00 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
On 10/01/2012 07:06 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Isn't there another difference in that your code samples at a rate
> determined by the wall-clock time rather than the cpu-time of the process?
I'm afraid many POSIXish systems get this wrong too. Some don't
even claim to support CPU-time timers. Others claim to, but
silently substitute wall-clock time. One really can't take sample
intervals as if they were gospel; they're not. It's better to
think of them as just samples of the CPU.
- Re: Elisp native profiler, (continued)
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Paul Eggert, 2012/10/01
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/01
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/01
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/01
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Paul Eggert, 2012/10/01
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/01
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Paul Eggert, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Jason Rumney, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/02
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Jason Rumney, 2012/10/03
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/03
- Re: Elisp native profiler, Paul Eggert, 2012/10/01