[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reachable killed buffers
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Reachable killed buffers |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:30:33 +0200 |
> Right, but as I understand it in the meantime it would still exist as
> a dead buffer, and would continue to pressure the GC. And it might
> inadvertently survive the next sweep too, no?
Yes. But a user could have a reference right to the dead buffer which
is much more likely than a reference to an object of a window's previous
or next buffers.
> The goal is to reclaim
> all the dead buffers, not just some of them.
Unless they have strong pointers. The ones from the windows are weak.
martin
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, (continued)
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/12
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Paul Eggert, 2012/09/13
- Re: Reachable killed buffers,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/14
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2012/09/14
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, martin rudalics, 2012/09/14
- Re: Reachable killed buffers, Dmitry Antipov, 2012/09/13
Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109890: Do not mark objects from deleted buffers, windows and frames., martin rudalics, 2012/09/06