[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C backtraces for Emacs
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: C backtraces for Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:39:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 08/22/2012 09:01 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean. An assertion violation on Windows calls a
> function that displays an abort dialogue, giving the user a chance to
> attach a debugger. If the user does attach a debugger, she can then
> display a backtrace from the debugger. There's no other facility to
> display a backtrace on Windows that I'm aware of.
Yes, sorry, that's what I meant. The idea is that the Windows build
can just copy execinfo.in.h to execinfo.h, which means Emacs
will continue to behave as before when eassert fails.
- inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/17
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/17
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Daniel Colascione, 2012/08/18
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/21
- C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Daniel Colascione, 2012/08/22
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/23
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/25
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/25
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Andreas Schwab, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/24