[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside) |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 02:33:43 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> If insults won't persuade you, here are some real benefits.
>> raw-strings are a huge convenience when writing.[1] They correspond
>> to the way you enter a regexp to isearch, and to the documentation.
>
> And here we're back at regexps. I already agreed that they're
> convenient for regexps, but pointed out that a better solution would
> be to fix the regexp syntax so it doesn't backslash-escape every
> special character.
This would be a backward-incompatible change to the regexp engine,
wouldn't it?
--Dmitry
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), (continued)
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/11
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Dmitri Paduchikh, 2012/08/11
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/11
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Vr Rm, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Davis Herring, 2012/08/10
- Learning Emacs regexp (was: Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside)), chad, 2012/08/10
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/08/11
- Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside),
Dmitry Gutov <=