[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CL package suggestion
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: CL package suggestion |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:06:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
> Agree about cl- being better than ecl- .
> Btw, if remove-if becomes defalias'ed to cl-remove-if, aren't the two calls
> indistinguishable to the byte compiler?
The name is different, so the compiler can definitely tell the difference.
> If they are, and calling cl-remove wouldn't trigger a warning,
> wouldn't remove-if calls also become warning-less?
Not necessarily, no.
Stefan
- CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/03
- Re: CL package suggestion, Glenn Morris, 2012/04/03
- Re: CL package suggestion, Glenn Morris, 2012/04/03
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/03
- Re: CL package suggestion, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/03
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/03
- Re: CL package suggestion,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/08
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/08
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/09
- Re: CL package suggestion, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/09
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/09
- Re: CL package suggestion, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/09
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/09
- Re: CL package suggestion, Ilya Shlyakhter, 2012/04/09
- Re: CL package suggestion, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/10
- Re: CL package suggestion, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/11