Re: Your changes in revision 106240

[Paul Eggert]

On 10/29/11 22:06, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> But this has nothing to do with EMACS_INT.

Actually, there's a direct connection to EMACS_INT.
That integer gives an upper bound on the length of the list FOUND.
Emacs list lengths fit into EMACS_INT, not int,
and variables that contain Emacs list lengths
should therefore be of type EMACS_INT, not int.

> this arg is *never* going to be that large

It was in my example :-).  In any case, the fix is trivial and safe.