[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
|
From: |
martin rudalics |
|
Subject: |
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:59:57 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> split-window-new-on-right
> split-window-new-on-bottom
>
> This also disambiguates where the new vs existing windows will be arranged
> (not entirely obvious for languages that write right->left).
If I "write right->left" I don't invert the meaning of the words "left"
and "right".
martin
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/29
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, anerbenartzi, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3,
martin rudalics <=
Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/26
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lluís, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/10/27
- RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/27