[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking count-words-region
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking count-words-region |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:04:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
> How about `count-lwc' and `count-lwc-region'? These names are short,
> accurate, mnemonic and are reminiscent of the *nix `wc'.
I suggest stopping this absurd discussion. The change Chong did is
the right thing to do.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/08
- RE: Rethinking count-words-region, Drew Adams, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/08
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Alan Mackenzie, 2011/10/07
- Re: Rethinking count-words-region, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/08