[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiled files without sources????
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Compiled files without sources???? |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:55:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Evgeny M. Zubok" <address@hidden> writes:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> There are multiple archives called "ELPA" and I am not sure which one
>> you mean. If it is the GNU one, we definitely must add the
>> documentation source. If it is another, we cannot tell those people
>> what to do with code that isn't copyright FSF. But we won't refer the
>> users to any archive that fails to follow thus rule.
>
> Yes, I meant the GNU ELPA and the packages `muse' and `auctex'.
Thanks for the heads up, I've added the Texinfo files to these packages
in the respository.
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, (continued)
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/30
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Evgeny M. Zubok, 2011/07/29
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, David Kastrup, 2011/07/29
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/29
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Evgeny M. Zubok, 2011/07/30
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, David Kastrup, 2011/07/30
- Re: Compiled files without sources????,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Compiled files without sources????, Richard Stallman, 2011/07/31