Re: bug#1580: zap-to-char too raw, or document

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:

> Apart from zap-to-char, is there anything that might need this?

Perhaps not.  We could just let that command read characters
specially...

> It's generally not worth it to add interactive codes for every
> conceivable operation.  In this case, I think using read-char in the
> interactive form should work.

Will `read-char' allow zapping to `C-g'?  It doesn't seem to be possible
to say `C-q C-g'...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/