Re: switch-to-buffer: for interactive use only

[Chong Yidong]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 01:39, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> How bout if switch-to-buffer tries to operate on the selected window,
>> and calls pop-to-buffer if that is not possible?
>
> Isn't that pop-to-buffer-same-window?

Yes, except switch-to-buffer has been around for much longer ;-)

So: how bout getting rid of `pop-to-buffer-same-window' and making
`switch-to-buffer' do what it does.