|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r104642: * src/process.c (Fset_process_buffer): Clarify return value in docstring. |
Date: | Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:53:24 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Actually, I generally prefer not to document the accidental return value >> of side-effecting functions. > What's accidental in > return buffer; > ? That the author could just as well have written "return Qnil;" or various other options. I can't find a single example of Elisp code in Emacs that does not ignore the return value of set-process-buffer (and that's a good thing). Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |