Re: Recursive compilation?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm personally using a different hack which doesn't solve all those
> problems either but is simple and doesn't suffer from as many problems
> in my experience: prefer loading the .el file if it's more recent.

I was thinking that perhaps if file a.el requires a macro from b.el, and
b.el isn't compiled, then a.elc would end up in a somewhat less compiled
state than it otherwise would?

But if that's not the case, then perhaps `require', when run via
`byte-compile-file', should just always load the .el file if it's more
recent?  That certainly sounds easy enough to implement --
`byte-compile-file' could just bind a variable to signal that it wanted
this behaviour.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/