Re: more url-utils?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> Oh, wait, no, because I wanted url-fetch to insert the result in the
> current-buffer, rather than creating a brand new buffer.

Yeah, that makes sense, perhaps.  In the async case too?

Hm.  Are there any charset issues?  I mean, if you're fetching an image,
it's a binary thing, and if you want to allow already having stuff in
the buffer, there might be issues...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/