[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 13:27:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 99634.2.937: Eli Zaretskii 2011-05-09 Backport revisions
> 103939.1.41..103939.1.44 (inclusive) from trunk (bug#8623)
>
> and revision 99634.2.937 indeed made a few changes to xdisp.c. But
> that version was merged to the trunk much earlier, in revision 104021,
> and "bzr annotate" still shows that the changes attributed to revision
> 99634.2.937 were made in 103939.1.41, not in 104201 nor in 99634.2.937:
Haven't we been over this before?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-01/msg00609.html
> I think this happens because bzr is smart enough to know that the
> revision which changed this line is already on the trunk, and so it
> doesn't record any changes for xdisp.c in the merge-commit or 104201.
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, (continued)
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/22
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges,
Glenn Morris <=
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/22