[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 17:46:56 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 15:37:41 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > In that discussion, we agreed to mention in the commit message the
> > versions that were reverse cherry-picked. But it looks like that
> > agreement was never acted upon.
>
> Apart from the fact that nothing was "reverse cherry-picked", how would
> that change anything?
See admin/bzrmerge.el.
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, (continued)
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Sven Joachim, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/21
Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/21
- Re: Confusing "bzr log" as result of merges, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/22