Re: more url-utils?

[Jason Rumney]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden writes:
>
>> Would the defun below be suitable to include in url-util?
>> You nearly always want to work with the data part of the document.
>
> Perhaps binding something like `url-return-data-only', and then having
> url-retrieve strip the headers before returning the buffer would be
> nice.

It would be even nicer if the headers were parsed into a buffer local alist.