Re: can `shuffle-vector' be moved?

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:47:47 -0300 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote: 

>> I mean that they all have the "cookie-" prefix while the package is
>> called cookie1.el.

SM> That's OK: the main rule is "use a prefix", if the prefix is exactly the
SM> same as the file-name it's best, but it's not crucial.

Oh, OK.  Thanks for explaining.

>> Yes, maybe we're at the tipping point where it's worth breaking up
>> subr.el into subr-vec.el, subr-list.el, subr-alist.el, etc.  OTOH it's
>> nice to have them in one place.

SM> No, the main reason for a misc-lib.el would be for it to not be
SM> preloaded, so the division wouldn't be based on the kind of
SM> functionality provided but on whether those functions/macros are used
SM> often or rarely.

OK, you and Chong will have to make the choice then :)

Thanks
Ted