[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 |
Date: |
Tue, 03 May 2011 00:19:13 -0400 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 04:27:55 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Please take a look at the attached patch, which is a rough cut
It's mostly a mechanical change, and looks fine to me upon first
reading.
However, this:
> --- src/w32.h 2011-04-25 01:30:51 +0000
> +++ src/w32.h 2011-05-02 01:47:27 +0000
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> #ifndef EMACS_W32_H
> #define EMACS_W32_H
>
> +#include "lisp.h"
is bad: lisp.h is already included in too many places. Why did you
need this?
Also, this:
> +/* The argument LIBRARIES is usually the variable
> + `dynamic-library-alist', which associates a symbol, identifying
> + an external DLL library, to a list of possible filenames.
> + The function returns NULL if no library could be loaded for
> + the given symbol, or if the library was previously loaded;
> + else the handle of the DLL. */
> +HMODULE
> +w32_delayed_load (Lisp_Object libraries, Lisp_Object library_id)
has a couple of problems in the commentary:
. it should describe the structure of the LIBRARIES alist explicitly,
like you'd do in a doc string, not just refer to
`dynamic-library-alist'
. it says nothing about the second argument (and IIUC what it means,
the "_id" part of the variable name is misleading)
Btw, why is it a good idea to return NULL if the library is already
loaded? Why not return its handle instead?
- Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Tom Tromey, 2011/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/05/02
- Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/02
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/02
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/03
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/03
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/05/03
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/05/03
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/03
RE: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Drew Adams, 2011/05/03
Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/03