[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:42:11 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The proposal was to bind M-f4 to save-buffers-kill-terminal or a
> similar function on Windows installations only.
I think handle-delete-frame would make more sense.
> M-f4 is a standard keybinding in Windows and it normally does the same
> thing as it does in Gnome and KDE, which is close the active window or
> exit the current application. The problem is that when I hit M-f4 in
> *Emacs* running on Windows, Emacs says that the key is undefined and
> that's the end of that.
> Right, but M-f4 doesn't "work" in Windows for a reason that is beyond
> me, but which some people on here seem to understand.
So now the question is indeed: how is M-f4's standard Windows behavior
of closing the window expected to be implemented? Is it possible to
globally (well, except for Emacs ;-) change this key to some other one?
> This is where the idea of binding M-f4 in Emacs came up. Whether it's
> a good one or a bad one, I don't know...
Maybe binding it (in w32) to handle-delete-frame would be a good way to
implement the expected behavior, indeed. But first, we need to know how
it's normally implemented in standard confirming applications.
Stefan
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/12
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/12
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Chad Brown, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/13
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/13
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/13
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/13
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/13
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Jason Rumney, 2011/01/13
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/13