[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jan 2011 07:20:03 +0100 (CET) |
> It will give funny results when MAKEINFO = off or no.
> Probably those cases ought to be reworked somehow.
Well, if MAKEINFO is `no', the old rules would fail similarly since no
binary is available at all and `makeinfo' gets called explicitly. And
for `off', the rules are never executed since the top-level target is
different.
However, we could indeed do some cosmetics to use, say, `:' as the
expansion of @MAKEINFO@ for those two cases but I wonder whether this
is really needed.
Werner
- MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/01
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/03
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Andreas Schwab, 2011/01/03
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/03
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Andreas Schwab, 2011/01/03
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/03
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/21
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Chong Yidong, 2011/01/22
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/23
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/23
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/23
- Re: MAKEINFO variable not honoured, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/01/23